Resource description:
As the ecosystem service concept has become more widely recognised, so the number of biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary methods available to assess ecosystem services has increased. There is relatively little guidance on how to select and combine these methods into hybrid approaches that address policy purposes. Based on experiences from 27 case studies with 33 different assessment and valuation methods in the OpenNESS project, this report aims to fill some of that gap in science and practice.
This report provides a number of tools that practitioners can use to plan, commission and evaluate integrated assessment and valuation studies of ecosystem services. The report starts by providing a rapid guide to commonly used biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary methods. A number of different ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ approaches to selecting methods fit-for-purpose are provided. OpenNESS method experts have developed detailed fact sheets on each method in the report appendix. These factsheets are also available directly from the Oppla marketplace.
Author/Contact:
David Barton, Norweigan Institute for Nature Research (NINA; David.Barton@nina.no) and Paula Harrison, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH; PaulaHarrison@ceh.ac.uk)
Images
Requirements:
- None (PDF document)
Advantages:
- Provides guidance on selecting and integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment
- Provides frameworks for understanding the decision-support challenges of ecosystem service appraisal
- Discusses ways of undertaking plural valuation in practice
Constraints:
- Based on method experts and case studies in the EU OpenNESS project
Uses of this resource:
Open for everyone to use for guidance on integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Full papers (4) are available from the journal Ecosystem Services: DOIs are https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.021.
Partners:
Partners from the OpenNESS project (see www.openness-project.eu)
DOI reference:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.021
Licence:
- Free, no licence
Development stage:
- Full, working product
Quality assurance:
- Scientific peer review