Ask Oppla question by Barbara Vincke

What can we do to ensure that the environmental dimension of the SDGs is not getting lost in the indicators? The IAEG proposed indicators in December 2015 were worrying, and those proposed in February 2016 seem even worse. To continue business as usual 'silo' approach, after the SDGs, would be huge missed opportunity. If we really want to change the world and make sure we go in the right direction we need a complete package of mandatory, harmonized and comparable indicators... Is anyone taking care of this on EU level?

Comments

Your call for an integrated approach to measure progress to achieve the SDGs is just. I am less pessimistic though. Bringing different development goals in one framework is a first, important step. Even integration among the different goals will require 'vertical' expertise and input.

At EU level, I see a lot of commitment, even at the highest policy level, to include the SDGs into the EU legislative framework and in future strategies (with a 2030 horizon). That would be a second step.

The Joint Research Centre has recently created an internal working group to streamline the indicator work at EU scale. Real integration of environment and biodiversity into other development areas is also expected from the Commission's program on nature based solutions. This is heavily supported by IUCN.

Posted on: 3 Mar 2016 - 15:12

I do hope so,  you could follow  your favourite SDG ? Just to ensure 

Re -use will be the hub of the issue as to establish som common ground (denominators)  to monitor progress but I am a not entirely sure EU interoperable standards will do as proxies for all  albeit the better the sets are and verifiable the better  and the EU does after all have some experience in such processes and ultimately  I hope will contribute to good operative indicators 

this weeks session point of departure  was http://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/47th-session/documents/2016-2-IAEG-SD...  and some tendencies to disagree but still 

Outcome of my 'pet goal targets and indicators' was not entirely in vain 

http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/metadata-compilation/Metadata-Goal-14.pdf

The last metadata is here : http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/iaeg-sdgs/metadata-compilation

Veronique JasinskiAnonymous

Alex Borrini BorriniAnonymous

Isabella PriceAnonymous

Kaixuan PanAnonymous

Stephanie DayAnonymous

Bastian BekiriAnonymous

Carlo D’AnnibaleAnonymous

Colum O'ConnorAnonymous

Jude LunaAnonymous

Natasha FloresAnonymous

Enrique ZuñigaAnonymous

maya CollinsAnonymous

Vahdettin DemirAnonymous

Maria GalloAnonymous

Susanna MolkanenAnonymous

Lubin MogbilAnonymous

Georgia PapapetrouAnonymous

Georgia PapapetrouAnonymous

Anh ChapmanAnonymous

Chester McDonaldAnonymous

Ilgın AlbayrakAnonymous

Andre BaumannAnonymous

Sauraj GambhirAnonymous

Andrej CikvariAnonymous

SREEJITA BANERJEEAnonymous

Stevy KopeliaAnonymous

Valentina Uribe JaramilloAnonymous

Ofir Weltsch LovalAnonymous

Ammie BerglundAnonymous

Nurul Inzana FilailAnonymous

Samuel RibetAnonymous

Sherry HensonAnonymous

Juliette BoizeauAnonymous

Stevy KopeliaAnonymous

Andre BaumannAnonymous

Yemoi HoebenAnonymous

Tünde MikóAnonymous

José GómezAnonymous

Conor  DalyAnonymous

Hedda MostAnonymous

Tiina YnniläAnonymous

Karin MorellAnonymous

Björn RingselleAnonymous

Angelyn BeckerAnonymous

Ailís KeyesAnonymous

Lorenza NardellaAnonymous

Martin GruboeckAnonymous

Elaine FidalgoAnonymous

Titus ThombaAnonymous

Titus ThombaAnonymous

Titus ThombaAnonymous

Posted on: 10 Mar 2016 - 16:12